DeeAnn Marie

Month

June 2012

22 posts

Anonymous wealthy couple's $30-million gift to help homeless in Vancouver  → vancouversun.com

Coun. Kerry Jang, a University of B.C. professor of psychiatry who specializes in mental health issues and is the city’s representative on housing and homeless issues, was nearly moved to tears by the donors’ largesse. He said he and city staff, including Judy Graves, the coordinator specializing in dealing with the homeless, have sometimes despaired at trying to solve the complex, interwoven issues of homelessness, addiction and mental health.

“It is a bit of an emotional moment for me, simply because for many years Judy and I and many of our staff have been out there and we see the suffering every single day. And every day I feel hopeless because what can we do? We put [people] into hospital for a while and they are let back out on the street again with no hope. It is just a revolving door, a revolving door, a revolving door,” he said.

“Taylor Manor is fundamentally different. Taylor Manor provides that hope, that place of belonging, that place of care. It is like when you come home from a long trip and you come in through the front door and sit down on the couch and breathe ‘I’m home.’ This is the vision of our donors and one that I am so glad to help bring forward.”


It’s stories like this that give me hope that people do care about the homeless.

Edit: I found this article through someone on facebook who wrote:

the numbers are stupid. 30 mill for 50 some people?

And I wrote:

The article says, “$14 million renovation and expansion plan for the 1915 Tudor Revival-style heritage mansion” so that’s to get it started and the annual operating budget is $900,000.
Sounds like the rest of the money is being put in an account where the interest will continue to pay for operations. Restoring buildings is crazy expensive and housing in general in Vancouver is very costly. This insures that after renovations, that the place will continued to be used for its intended purpose to help the homeless, and not be bought by some developer when times get tough.


Besides being a really long winded answer to somebody complaining on their own facebook (I’m waiting to be mocked), I forgot to mention, government funding is very fickle stuff. While the current municipal gov’t in Vancouver is striving to end homelessness, the provincial gov’t hasn’t been as gung-ho about putting homeless people in new units.



If funding is freely given by one gov’t, when a different one is elected that funding can just as easily stop. Which makes operating a non-profit very precarious - cozy up to close to one gov’t and the next pulls your funding, don’t cozy up enough to the one you have and they’ll forget the great work you are doing. It’s best not to have to rely on gov’t funding at all, but that requires donors and often very generous donors, so that groups can adapt to the needs of their community and the lean times can be weathered.

Jun 30, 20123 notes
#homeless #homelessness #Vancouver #donors #complex needs #addiction #mental health #housing
Jun 29, 20123,141 notes
#octopus
Play
Jun 28, 20121 note
#publicity #PR #public relations #communications #non-profits #libraries
Jun 28, 2012362 notes
Jun 28, 201228,513 notes
Play
Jun 27, 20121 note
#Mark Horvath #UK #donate #hardlynormal #homeless #homelessness #invisible people #invisiblepeople.tv #non-profits
Jun 27, 2012184 notes
Invisible Families: The Homeless You Don't See → seattletimes.nwsource.com

Moore is down to her last $6. It’s nearing 10 o’clock and it’s been hours since the two have had a meal.

Mall security has been circling. Moore knows they can’t spend the night parked here, but the 49-year-old single mother, born and raised in South King County, has no clue where to go.

“I’m mentally exhausted,” she says.

While overall homelessness in King County has steadied, it appears to be rising among families, a trend playing out across the nation.

Parents with children are the fastest-growing yet least-visible segment of the homeless population, far more likely to be doubled up in the homes of friends or living in their cars than to be at a busy intersection asking for help.

At its core, homelessness is driven by poverty and lack of affordable housing, and many believe the true breadth of the problem may not yet be evident as families who lost their homes in this recession still hang on with relatives.


So many great articles and videos to watch at the link about families experiencing homelessness in the Seattle Area. As a family it is really hard to stay together in the shelter system. 

With more and more families experiencing homelessness, no wonder they choose to sleep in their vehicles, or abandoned buildings. Homelessness and the supports to emergency house families often seems designed to take away the supports and community people already have in place.

Jun 26, 20121 note
#homelessness #invisible families #homeless #seattle #families
Texas makes sharing food with the homeless illegal. → blog.foodnotbombs.net
Jun 25, 20127 notes
Play
Jun 22, 20122 notes
#homelessness #mental health #poverty #the lighthouse #elder care #long read #saskatoon #saskatchewan
“I find it fascinating how, in reality, we are simultaneously the protagonist/antagonist/supporting/major/minor/recurring/one-dimensional characters in each other’s story. We move in and out of these characters in everyday life without even realizing that, beyond our own narrative, we may actually be the most significant part in someone else’s day or simply a mere backdrop. Our understanding of each other is porous, shifting, half-filled and pieced together from multiple people’s narratives, but it’s the totality of all of these stories that make up our reality.” — Stan’s brain (via stanielsbookclub)
Jun 19, 20122 notes
Jun 18, 2012695 notes
Jun 16, 201237 notes
#television #west wing #newsroom #aaron sorkin
Jun 15, 2012317 notes
“…let’s get it clear is that there is no “War on Drugs.” You cannot make war on inanimate objects, only on people. What we are witnessing is a war on drug users, particularly poor and minority drug users. This so-called war is a failure only if one accepts it on its own terms–that is, if one believes that its real purpose is to interdict the supply of illegal substances and to prevent drug use. On that level it’s a colossal failure of historic proportions. However, from the perspective of justifying repression–of justifying the continued funding of highly armed police forces, of validating the existence of the legal machinery of what is called the “justice” system, and of channeling profits into the owners of private prisons and the many industries that supply prisons–the war is a major success. To which benefits we can add the political value of fear mongering and offering to be “tough on crime” to political opportunists vying for the support of a frightened, credulous and uninformed public.” —Gabor Mate
Jun 12, 2012106 notes
“No, Mitt, corporations are not people. People have hearts, they have kids, they get jobs, they get sick, they love, they cry, they dance, they live and they die. Learn the difference.” —Elizabeth Warren
Jun 11, 2012142 notes
“Love is a horrible game for ignorant suckers, but can we honestly say there is any game with higher risks and a greater payoff for the winners? The whole setup of the thing is very bizarre- everyone fails, and fails again, and sometimes takes longer to fail but still usually fails.

At some point a relationship might seem to be taking an unusually long time to fail, almost impossibly long. Hopefully the person (eventually) realizes it just isn’t going to fail. In that moment, if they’re smart they know they’ve won the game, they never need to play again.”
—via doug
Jun 11, 201219 notes
#love
Jun 10, 2012361 notes
Play
Jun 10, 20122 notes
#politics #american #elizabeth warren
Jun 10, 201222 notes
Next page →
2012 2013
  • January 25
  • February 24
  • March 47
  • April 34
  • May 36
  • June 15
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012 2013
  • January 17
  • February 15
  • March 15
  • April 15
  • May 18
  • June 22
  • July 42
  • August 26
  • September 23
  • October 20
  • November 23
  • December 28
2010 2011 2012
  • January 26
  • February 21
  • March 40
  • April 18
  • May 17
  • June 20
  • July 17
  • August 10
  • September 15
  • October 21
  • November 9
  • December 8
2009 2010 2011
  • January 36
  • February 17
  • March 40
  • April 25
  • May 19
  • June 26
  • July 22
  • August 28
  • September 24
  • October 21
  • November 24
  • December 18
2008 2009 2010
  • January 19
  • February 24
  • March 38
  • April 46
  • May 48
  • June 32
  • July 28
  • August 29
  • September 55
  • October 49
  • November 60
  • December 56
2008 2009
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August 5
  • September 3
  • October 8
  • November 12
  • December 17