DeeAnn Marie

74 notes &

Can the Church Alone Provide Welfare for the Poor?

I live in a city of about 21,000 people in Alabama. There are, easily, 60 or more evangelical churches in my city. We have one of the highest churches per capita ratios in the country. Of those churches, only our church and one other will give money towards helping those in need. I know because I have looked into it for myself! There used to be a couple of others, but when I contacted them for help, most churches had quit doing this type of benevolence because of “budget issues,” or because it was too “time consuming.” Unfortunately, many of my inquiries as to why they had stopped giving boiled down to the fact that people took advantage of the church’s kindness. But I couldn’t help but wonder: Isn’t the very nature of a gracious act to give anyway?

Our church is rather small, and we can only afford to help out $50 per family; they have to decide if they want us to put it towards groceries, power, or rent. What’s readily apparent to me is that if the government didn’t get involved in welfare, we’d have far, far more people out on the streets, and many more children in desperate situations without proper food, shelter, and clothing. I thank God for WIC (“Women, Infants, and Children”); I would be an emotional wreck if it didn’t exist. During the time of my writing this article, I’ve helped a grandmother who is taking care of three children, one of whom is severely handicapped. I don’t know what would become of this woman and her grandchildren if it weren’t for food stamps. I’d have trouble sleeping.

Sometimes, I hear the objection that the government ought to stay out of the “welfare business.” The worry is that government welfare creates dependence and causes citizens to be lazy, and it is true that the apostle Paul taught that if a person does not work, then neither should he eat (2 Thessalonians 3:10). I agree with the Apostle Paul; the problem is that he is not addressing destitute widows, abandoned mothers, or men and women with severe injuries who cannot work. He is talking about lazy church members who were busy bodies. It is folly to take the apostle’s admonition and apply it across the board to every person on welfare. Furthermore, it underestimates the difficulty of living as a single parent with three children in a small repurposed FEMA trailer without reliable transportation, money for rent, and childcare even if one could get a job. When someone gets a job here, the best he or she could do would be about $8 an hour, and maybe after three months of employment, he or she would qualify for health benefits. What would people in this situation do with their children in the meantime? How will they pay rent until the check comes? (Sometimes employers take up to a month to get the first check out.)

The objection to the government being in the welfare business is often followed by the thought that such benevolence ought to be the jurisdiction of the church. But is that plausible? Could the church do it alone?

Food for thought.

(Source: azspot)

Filed under welfare poverty poor

  1. thejillsequence reblogged this from math-erin
  2. melancholyannex reblogged this from pewpewlazernipples
  3. pewpewlazernipples reblogged this from pumpkinthot
  4. dieu-le-veutt reblogged this from dansphalluspalace
  5. tropicalfruitbabe reblogged this from darkjez
  6. goodbyeolepaint reblogged this from deeannmarie and added:
    There should be no Christian church in existence that does not help the poor. That goes against everything Jesus taught.
  7. dansphalluspalace reblogged this from pumpkinthot
  8. pumpkinthot reblogged this from wretchedoftheearth
  9. hairtrending reblogged this from darkjez
  10. rainwasheseverythingaway reblogged this from invisiblelad
  11. selfimportantweaverofwords reblogged this from invisiblelad
  12. thegayeducator reblogged this from wretchedoftheearth
  13. popelizbet reblogged this from darkjez
  14. birchsoda reblogged this from wretchedoftheearth
  15. lafrondeuse reblogged this from azspot
  16. dangercupcakemurdericing reblogged this from darkjez
  17. mejamijamoja reblogged this from darkjez
  18. darkjez reblogged this from wretchedoftheearth
  19. wretchedoftheearth reblogged this from invisiblelad
  20. overmyglasses reblogged this from invisiblelad and added:
    Everyone should read this. I’m shocked (but by now I shouldn’t be)
  21. invisiblelad reblogged this from 6dogs9cats and added:
    Nevermind that religious charities can come with all manner of strings attached when it comes to how those in need get...
  22. 6dogs9cats reblogged this from azspot and added:
    in 2001, 1 day after GW was inaugurated, the first matter he signed into law was the “faith based initiative”. It broke...
  23. theadamglass reblogged this from azspot
  24. deeannmarie reblogged this from azspot and added:
    Food for thought.